Gebben_Edit/Defense_Slides
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated Chapter II content,still working

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Alex 2024-10-23 11:50:14 -06:00
parent 1f722e109f
commit 807e5b8fec
3 changed files with 51 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
LATEX/Chapter_I/Chapter_I.tex
View File

@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ The parcel fixed effect $\gamma_i$ captures unobserved time invariant attributes
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Results}
\begin{frame}[plain]
\only<1>{\input{Chapter_I/tables/All_Models.tex}}
\only<2>{\input{Chapter_I/tables/All_Models_Small.tex}}

48
LATEX/Chapter_II/Chapter_II.tex
View File

@ -8,15 +8,59 @@
\begin{frame}{Guiding Question}
\Large
How does Subdistrict 1 water management change the efficacy of federal payment for environmental services (PES) water conservation efforts?
\vfill
\large
\vfill
\onslide<2-> Staggered DiD study of the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) for Subdistrict 1 farms initiated in 2014.
\begin{itemize}
\onslide<3->{\item{Effect from enrolled wells, neighboring wells, and selection in the program }}
\onslide<4->{\item{The federal PES conserves 32\% less ground water. }}
\onslide<5->{\item{Program costs rise by 29.5\%. }}
\onslide<6->{\item{Payment flows to the farmers most harmed by the Subdistrict pumping fee.}}
\onslide<6->{\item{Pays the farmers most harmed by the pumping fee.}}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection{Background}
\begin{frame}{CREP}
Provides payments to fallow irrigated land in environmentally sensitive regions. The first contracts started in 2014.
\vfill
\onslide<2->{ \textbf{Goals}
\begin{enumerate}
\item{Enroll 40,000 acres of cropland}
\item{Reduce water use by 60,060 acre-feet per year.}
\item{Reduce erosion}
\item{Increase native cover crops}
\end{enumerate}
}
\vfill
\onslide<3-> {\textbf{Current Status}
\begin{enumerate}
\item{10,868 acres enrolled (27.1\% of goal)}
\item{Estimate of 14,755 acre-feet saved a year (24.6\% of goal)}
\end{enumerate}
}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}{CREP: Payments}
Different payments depending on contract length. Additional support from RGWCD and Sbd1.
\vfill
\begin{columns}
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
\textbf{Farm Service Agency (FSA) payments}
\begin{enumerate}
\item{15 year contract}
\item{\$288 per acre per year}
\item{\$300 per acre sign up bonus}
\end{enumerate}
\end{column}
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
\textbf{Farm Service Agency (FSA) payments}
\begin{enumerate}
\item{Permanent retirement}
\item{\$22 per acre per year}
\item{\$100 per acre sign up bonus}
\end{enumerate}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}

8
LATEX/Defense.tex
View File

@ -65,14 +65,14 @@
\tableofcontents
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Chapter I: Collective Action to Manage Agricultural Groundwater, Drivers and Outcomes}\label{ChapterI}
\input{Chapter_I/Chapter_I.tex}
%\section{Chapter I: Collective Action to Manage Agricultural Groundwater, Drivers and Outcomes}\label{ChapterI}
% \input{Chapter_I/Chapter_I.tex}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Chapter II: Policy Interactions of Water Conservation Programs. Is Efficiency Always Efficient?}\label{ChapterII}
\input{Chapter_II/Chapter_II.tex}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\section{Chapter III: Bitcoin Mining, the Next Shale Boom?}\label{ChapterIII}
\input{Chapter_III/Chapter_III.tex}
%\section{Chapter III: Bitcoin Mining, the Next Shale Boom?}\label{ChapterIII}
% \input{Chapter_III/Chapter_III.tex}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%