\documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[style=apa,natbib=true]{biblatex} \usepackage{cleveref} \bibliography{Supporting/Beamer.bib} \setbeamercovered{transparent=25} %Information to be included in the title page: \title{Using SEEA EA in valuing fisheries: Deriving Exchange Values for the Nearshore Fisheries of the Main Hawaiian Island } \subtitle{Response by: Alex Gebben} \date{2024} \begin{document} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \frame{\titlepage} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{frame} \frametitle{Methods} System of Environmental Economic Accounting \begin{itemize} \item{Catch area} \item{Species} \item{Market price} \item{Catch rate} \item{Regional probability of fish being caught} \item{NPV of harvest} \end{itemize} \end{frame} %%%%%%%%% \begin{frame} \frametitle{Results} Regional distribution of direct economic value of from ecological system. \newline \newline Total yearly average value of \$3.1 million dollars between commercial (\$2.5 million) and recreational fishing. \newline \newline Detailed septation of species, location and time. \end{frame} %%%%%%%%% \begin{frame} \frametitle{Importance} \begin{itemize} \item{First analysis providing a monetary value to a critical ecosystem} \item{Provides policy makers with a tool for cost benefit analysis of ecological policy} \item{Contribution to natural resource, renewable resource, and fishery economics} \end{itemize} \end{frame} %%%%%%%%% \begin{frame} \frametitle{Suggestions} \only<1-2>{Consider comparing the current exchange value to a theoretical ideal harvest rate. A steady state Hamiltonian can be used to estimate an ideal catch rate. \onslide<2>{ \begin{itemize} \item{What would the steady state fish harvest be if economically efficient?} \item{Does the open access commercial fishing license lead to a tragedy of the commons?} \item{Are there technological limit's in place?} \item{Crab harvest seasons have been found to suppress price, and increase effort} \end{itemize}} } \only<3-4>{Consider accounting for labor hours in operating cost \onslide<4>{ \begin{itemize} \item{When the resources are open access the added cost of time, brings total profits to zero.} \item{Ricardian rents of the fishery are of interest.} \end{itemize} } } \only<5->{ What other habitat value might be measured? \onslide<6>{ \begin{itemize} \item{Fishing guided trips} \item{Revealed preference through travel distance, to fish in Hawaii} \item{Money multiplier model, IMPLAN} \end{itemize}} } \end{frame} %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \begin{frame} \frametitle{Minor Points} \begin{itemize} \item{The weighted average price equation does not include time. Fish price can be seasonal} \item{It is not clear what discount rate \(r_{t}\) was selected} \item{Consider adjusting to 2024 dollars instead of 2022} \item{I would enjoy seeing how the map changes over time} \end{itemize} \end{frame} \begin{frame} \huge Conclusion \end{frame} \end{document}