101 lines
2.9 KiB
TeX
101 lines
2.9 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{beamer}
|
|
\usepackage[style=apa,natbib=true]{biblatex}
|
|
\usepackage{cleveref}
|
|
|
|
\bibliography{Supporting/Beamer.bib}
|
|
|
|
\setbeamercovered{transparent=25}
|
|
%Information to be included in the title page:
|
|
\title{Using SEEA EA in valuing fisheries: Deriving Exchange Values for the Nearshore Fisheries of the Main Hawaiian Island }
|
|
\subtitle{Response by: Alex Gebben}
|
|
\date{2024}
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\frame{\titlepage}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Methods}
|
|
System of Environmental Economic Accounting
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{Catch area}
|
|
\item{Species}
|
|
\item{Market price}
|
|
\item{Catch rate}
|
|
\item{Regional probability of fish being caught}
|
|
\item{NPV of harvest}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Results}
|
|
Regional distribution of direct economic value of from ecological system.
|
|
\newline
|
|
\newline
|
|
|
|
Total yearly average value of \$3.1 million dollars between commercial (\$2.5 million) and recreational fishing.
|
|
\newline
|
|
\newline
|
|
|
|
Detailed septation of species, location and time.
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Importance}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{First analysis providing a monetary value to a critical ecosystem}
|
|
\item{Provides policy makers with a tool for cost benefit analysis of ecological policy}
|
|
\item{Contribution to natural resource, renewable resource, and fishery economics}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Suggestions}
|
|
\only<1-2>{Consider comparing the current exchange value to a theoretical ideal harvest rate. A steady state Hamiltonian can be used to estimate an ideal catch rate.
|
|
|
|
\onslide<2>{ \begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{What would the steady state fish harvest be if economically efficient?}
|
|
\item{Does the open access commercial fishing license lead to a tragedy of the commons?}
|
|
\item{Are there technological limit's in place?}
|
|
\item{Crab harvest seasons have been found to suppress price, and increase effort}
|
|
\end{itemize}}
|
|
}
|
|
\only<3-4>{Consider accounting for labor hours in operating cost
|
|
\onslide<4>{
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{When the resources are open access the added cost of time, brings total profits to zero.}
|
|
\item{Ricardian rents of the fishery are of interest.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
\only<5->{
|
|
What other habitat value might be measured?
|
|
\onslide<6>{
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{Fishing guided trips}
|
|
\item{Revealed preference through travel distance, to fish in Hawaii}
|
|
\item{Money multiplier model, IMPLAN}
|
|
\end{itemize}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Minor Points}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{The weighted average price equation does not include time. Fish price can be seasonal}
|
|
\item{It is not clear what discount rate \(r_{t}\) was selected}
|
|
\item{Consider adjusting to 2024 dollars instead of 2022}
|
|
\item{I would enjoy seeing how the map changes over time}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\huge Conclusion
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|