\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage[style=apa,natbib=true]{biblatex}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tikz}
%\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{cleveref}
\newcommand\blfootnote[1]{%
  \begingroup
  \renewcommand\thefootnote{}\footnote{#1}% \addtocounter{footnote}{-1}%
  \endgroup
}
\newcommand{\levelcircle}[1]{%
  \tikz{
    % Outer black outline
    \draw[fill=black, draw=black] (0,0) circle (0.38em);
    % White gap
    \draw[fill=white, draw=white] (0,0) circle (0.30em);
    % Inner colored circle (no outline)
    \draw[fill=#1, draw=none] (0,0) circle (0.22em);
  }%
}
\usetheme{Madrid}
\setbeamercovered{transparent=25}
\title{Wyoming's Nuclear Supply Chain Opportunities and Challenges}
\author{Alexander Gebben}
%\institute{Center for Business and Economic Analysis, University of Wyoming}
\date{April 14th, 2026}
\begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\frame{\titlepage}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
	\frametitle{Obstacles: What will it take?}
\begin{table}[h!]
\centering
\caption{\textbf{Scoring System for Wyoming Nuclear Development}}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l l}
\rowcolor{gray!15}
\textbf{Score} & \textbf{Summary} \\
\onslide<2,4>{\levelcircle{green!50!black} Major Advantage & Wyoming has a unique advantage\\
\levelcircle{green!80!black} Moderate Advantage & Wyoming has non-unique advantage\\
\levelcircle{green!45} Minor Advantage & Status quo development}\\
\hline
\onslide<3,4>{\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Financial support and status quo development\\
\levelcircle{orange} Moderate Obstacle & Financial support or industry change\\
\levelcircle{red} Major Obstacle & Significant financial and industry change\\
\levelcircle{red!60!black} Severe Obstacle & Impossible\\}
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}	\end{frame}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}
	\frametitle{Cost and Benefits: Is it worth it?}
	\only<1-3>{\textbf{Direct Benefits and Costs}
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item<1->{Producer surplus}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item<1->{Revenue-Costs}
				\item<1->{Cost can be an input to other producers}
			\end{itemize}
		\item<2->{Consumer surplus}
	\begin{itemize}
			\item<2->{Private value}
			\item<2->{Lower electricty costs}
			\item<2->{Better stablity}
	\end{itemize}
		\item<3->{Taxes}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item<3->{Goverment spending value}
			\end{itemize}
	\end{enumerate}
}
\only<4-7>{\textbf{Indirect Benefits and Costs}
	\begin{enumerate}
		\item<4->{Externalities}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item<5->{Positive}
				\item<5->{Negative}
			\end{itemize}
		\item<6->{Indirect and induced spending effects (More consumer and producer surplus)}
		\item<7->{Opportunity Costs: What else could you do with the money?}
	\end{enumerate}
}

\only<8-9>{
\begin{itemize}
	\item<8->{\textbf{Total Benefits and Costs (Yes\(/\)No)}}
	\item<9->{\textbf{Does everyone benefit? }
			\begin{itemize}
				\item{What can help?}
			\end{itemize}
		}
\end{itemize}
}

\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Manufacturing}
\centering	
\begin{table}[htbp]
	\centering
\begin{tabular}{l l}
\rowcolor{gray!15}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{Key Wyoming Advantages}} \\
\onslide<1->{\levelcircle{green!50!black} Major Advantage & Tax exemption for manufacturing\\
\levelcircle{green!80!black} Moderate Advantage & Existing industries that could pivot}\\
\rowcolor{gray!15}
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\onslide<2->{\textbf{Key Wyoming Obstacles}}}\\
\onslide<2->{\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Comparative advantage\\
\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Tied to nuclear energy economics}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}	
\onslide<3->{
	\textbf{What is required to aquire the industry?}
\begin{itemize}
	\item{Wyoming tax incetives will be enough if nuclear growth continues} 
	\item{Attracting large industries from overseas would require additional incentives} 
\end{itemize}
}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[plain]
	\centering
\huge Component Manufacturing Expansion
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Direct Effects}
	Assume an existing Wyoming manufacturing firm adds 20 new employees to produce nuclear components.
	\newline
	\begin{columns}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Benefits}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{20 employment}
		\item{\$1.7 million in employee compensation}
		\item{\$500 thousand in profit}
		\item{\$18.4 thousand for county taxes.}
		\item{\$420 thousand in U.S. taxes.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Costs}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{\(\approx\)\$13 thousand benefits moved from state taxes to profit.}
		\item{14 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
		\item{1 acre of land used.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\vfill
Total direct value add of \$2.27 million per year, \$1.87 million of Wyoming GDP contribution.
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Indirect Effects}
	\begin{columns}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Benefits}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{12 employment}
		\item{\$672 thousand in employee compensation}
		\item{\$220 thousand in profit}
		\item{\$37.5 thousand for county taxes}
		\item{\$70 thousand for State taxes}
		\item{\$170 million in U.S. taxes}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Costs}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{20 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\vfill
Total indirect value add of \$1.24 million per year, \$1.07 million of Wyoming GDP contribution.
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Overall Considerations}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{\$2.9 million in Wyoming GDP increase}
		\item{32 added employees}
		\item{24 tons of non-toxic waste}
		\item{No (or minor) radioactivty considerations}
	\end{itemize}

\vfill
\begin{columns}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Who Benefits?}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{Industry employees}
		\item{Local business}
		\item{Nuclear power plant operators}
		\item{Local and State goverment amenities}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Who might be harmed?}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{No clear indviduals with substantial costs.}
		\item{Local taxes could compenstate if some increase traffic or other costs.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\end{columns}



\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{frame}[plain]
	\centering
\huge Nuclear reactor construction 
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Direct Effects}
	A Wyoming, reactor following similar construction patterns as TerraPower.
	Discount at 5\% and average employment over all years of construction.
	\newline
	\begin{columns}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Benefits}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{748 employment}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item{5\% are local, and 95\% are from Wyoming}
				\item{37 from the County}
				\item{710 from rest of the State}
			\end{itemize}
		\item{\$365 million in employee compensation}
		\item{\$124 million in profit}
		\item{\$9.6 million in sales tax.}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item{Assuming distribution of 69\% State tax and 1\% county}
				\item{\$6.6 million State}
				\item{\$3 million county taxes)
			\end{itemize}
		\item{\$33 million in property tax.}
			\begin{itemize}
				\item{Assuming distribution of 15\% State tax and 85\% county}
				\item{\$5 million State}
				\item{\$28 million county taxes)
			\end{itemize}
		\item{\$97 million in U.S. taxes.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
		\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
			\textbf{Costs}
	\begin{itemize}
		\item{\(\approx\)\$13 thousand benefits moved from state taxes to profit.}
		\item{14 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
		\item{1 acre of land used.}
	\end{itemize}
\end{column}
\end{columns}
\vfill
Total direct value add of \$2.27 million per year, \$1.87 million of Wyoming GDP contribution.
\end{frame}



\end{document}