299 lines
8.6 KiB
TeX
299 lines
8.6 KiB
TeX
\documentclass{beamer}
|
|
\usepackage[style=apa,natbib=true]{biblatex}
|
|
\usepackage{tabularx}
|
|
\usepackage{colortbl}
|
|
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
|
\usepackage{tikz}
|
|
%\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
|
|
\usepackage{cleveref}
|
|
\newcommand\blfootnote[1]{%
|
|
\begingroup
|
|
\renewcommand\thefootnote{}\footnote{#1}% \addtocounter{footnote}{-1}%
|
|
\endgroup
|
|
}
|
|
\newcommand{\levelcircle}[1]{%
|
|
\tikz{
|
|
% Outer black outline
|
|
\draw[fill=black, draw=black] (0,0) circle (0.38em);
|
|
% White gap
|
|
\draw[fill=white, draw=white] (0,0) circle (0.30em);
|
|
% Inner colored circle (no outline)
|
|
\draw[fill=#1, draw=none] (0,0) circle (0.22em);
|
|
}%
|
|
}
|
|
\usetheme{Madrid}
|
|
\setbeamercovered{transparent=25}
|
|
\title{Wyoming's Nuclear Supply Chain Opportunities and Challenges}
|
|
\author{Alexander Gebben}
|
|
%\institute{Center for Business and Economic Analysis, University of Wyoming}
|
|
\date{April 14th, 2026}
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
|
|
\frame{\titlepage}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Obstacles: What will it take?}
|
|
\begin{table}[h!]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\caption{\textbf{Scoring System for Wyoming Nuclear Development}}
|
|
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}
|
|
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l l}
|
|
\rowcolor{gray!15}
|
|
\textbf{Score} & \textbf{Summary} \\
|
|
\onslide<2,4>{\levelcircle{green!50!black} Major Advantage & Wyoming has a unique advantage\\
|
|
\levelcircle{green!80!black} Moderate Advantage & Wyoming has non-unique advantage\\
|
|
\levelcircle{green!45} Minor Advantage & Status quo development}\\
|
|
\hline
|
|
\onslide<3,4>{\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Financial support and status quo development\\
|
|
\levelcircle{orange} Moderate Obstacle & Financial support or industry change\\
|
|
\levelcircle{red} Major Obstacle & Significant financial and industry change\\
|
|
\levelcircle{red!60!black} Severe Obstacle & Impossible\\}
|
|
\end{tabularx}
|
|
\end{table} \end{frame}
|
|
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Cost and Benefits: Is it worth it?}
|
|
\only<1-3>{\textbf{Direct Benefits and Costs}
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item<1->{Producer surplus}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item<1->{Revenue-Costs}
|
|
\item<1->{Cost can be an input to other producers}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item<2->{Consumer surplus}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item<2->{Private value}
|
|
\item<2->{Lower electricty costs}
|
|
\item<2->{Better stablity}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item<3->{Taxes}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item<3->{Goverment spending value}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
}
|
|
\only<4-7>{\textbf{Indirect Benefits and Costs}
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item<4->{Externalities}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item<5->{Positive}
|
|
\item<5->{Negative}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item<6->{Indirect and induced spending effects (More consumer and producer surplus)}
|
|
\item<7->{Opportunity Costs: What else could you do with the money?}
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\only<8-9>{
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item<8->{\textbf{Total Benefits and Costs (Yes\(/\)No)}}
|
|
\item<9->{\textbf{Does everyone benefit? }
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{What can help?}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
\begin{frame}[plain]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\huge Manufacturing
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Obstacles}
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l l}
|
|
\rowcolor{gray!15}
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{Key Wyoming Advantages}} \\
|
|
\onslide<1->{\levelcircle{green!50!black} Major Advantage & Tax exemption for manufacturing\\
|
|
\levelcircle{green!80!black} Moderate Advantage & Existing industries that could pivot}\\
|
|
\rowcolor{gray!15}
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\onslide<2->{\textbf{Key Wyoming Obstacles}}}\\
|
|
\onslide<2->{\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Comparative advantage\\
|
|
\levelcircle{yellow!100} Minor Obstacle & Tied to nuclear energy economics}
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
\onslide<3->{
|
|
\textbf{What is required to aquire the industry?}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{Wyoming tax incentives will be enough if nuclear growth continues}
|
|
\item{Attracting large industries from overseas would require additional incentives}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}{Direct Effects}
|
|
Assume an existing Wyoming manufacturing firm adds 20 new employees to produce nuclear components.
|
|
\newline
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Benefits}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{20 employment}
|
|
\item{\$1.7 million in employee compensation}
|
|
\item{\$500 thousand in profit}
|
|
\item{\$18.4 thousand for county taxes.}
|
|
\item{\$420 thousand in U.S. taxes.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Costs}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{\(\approx\)\$13 thousand benefits moved from state taxes to profit.}
|
|
\item{14 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
|
|
\item{1 acre of land used.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
\vfill
|
|
Total direct value add of \$2.27 million per year, \$1.87 million of Wyoming GDP contribution.
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Indirect Effects}
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Benefits}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{12 employment}
|
|
\item{\$672 thousand in employee compensation}
|
|
\item{\$220 thousand in profit}
|
|
\item{\$37.5 thousand for county taxes}
|
|
\item{\$70 thousand for State taxes}
|
|
\item{\$170 million in U.S. taxes}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Costs}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{20 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
\vfill
|
|
Total indirect value add of \$1.24 million per year, \$1.07 million of Wyoming GDP contribution.
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Overall Considerations}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{\$2.9 million in Wyoming GDP increase}
|
|
\item{32 added employees}
|
|
\item{24 tons of non-toxic waste}
|
|
\item{No (or minor) radioactivty considerations}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\vfill
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Who Benefits?}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{Industry employees}
|
|
\item{Local business}
|
|
\item{Nuclear power plant operators}
|
|
\item{Local and State goverment amenities}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Who might be harmed?}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{No clear indviduals with substantial costs.}
|
|
\item{Local taxes could compenstate if some increase traffic or other costs.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}[plain]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\huge Nuclear reactor
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
%%%%
|
|
\begin{frame}{Obstacles}
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{table}[htbp]
|
|
\centering
|
|
\begin{tabular}{l l}
|
|
\rowcolor{gray!15}
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{Key Wyoming Advantages}} \\
|
|
\levelcircle{green!50!black} Major Advantage & Tax exemption for advanced reactors\\
|
|
\levelcircle{green!80!black} Moderate Advantage & Coal power plant co-location\\
|
|
\rowcolor{gray!15}
|
|
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\onslide<2->{\textbf{Key Obstacles}}}\\
|
|
\onslide<2->{\levelcircle{red} Major Obstacle & Prices suppressed by natural gas\\
|
|
\levelcircle{orange} Moderate Obstacle & Experience needed to reduce costs}
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{table}
|
|
\onslide<3->{
|
|
\textbf{What is required to aquire the industry?}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{Financial support required to make nuclear a cheaper alternative to natural gas}
|
|
\item{\$2 billion of support for TerraPower overcomes this, Wyoming a feasible location.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Job Impacts}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Jobs.png}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
\begin{frame}{Wyoming Tax Impacts}
|
|
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Taxes.png}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Direct Construction Effects}
|
|
Total direct value add of \$629 million, \$408 million of Wyoming GDP contribution, \$49 million at the county level.\footnote{Discount at 5\% and average employment over all years of construction.}.
|
|
\vfill
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Benefits}
|
|
\small
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{748 employment}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
% \item{5\% are local, and 95\% are from Wyoming}
|
|
\item{37 from the County}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item{\$365 million in employee compensation}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{\$18.25 million local}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
% \item{\$124 million in profit}
|
|
\item{\$9.6 million in sales tax.}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
% \item{Assuming distribution of 69\% State tax and 31\% county}
|
|
\item{\$6.6 million State}
|
|
\item{\$3 million county taxes}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\item{\$33 million in property tax.}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
% \item{Assuming distribution of 15\% State tax and 85\% county}
|
|
\item{\$5 million State}
|
|
\item{\$28 million county taxes}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
% \item{\$97 million in U.S. taxes.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\textbf{Costs}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item{\(\approx\)\$13 thousand benefits moved from state taxes to profit.}
|
|
\item{14 tons of non-toxic waste products.}
|
|
\item{1 acre of land used.}
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|
|
|